zurück Home Mamma - Karzinom: Biphosphonat - Therapie
allgemeines Biphosphonate hemmen den Knochenabbau durch Osteoklasten und damit die Progression von Knochenmetastasen

Studie / Autor

Therapie Standard Knochen - Ereignisse: HR, hazard ratio; NTX, N-telopeptide levels; OS, overall survival; SC, subcutaneous; SRE, skeletal-related event; SMPR, skeletal morbidity period rate; Rate der Skeletmorbidität, skeletal morbidity rate; RR, risk ratio.

Paterson et al. (1)

Clodronate 1600 mg oral Placebo terminale hyperkalzaemische Episoden gesenkt(17 vs. 7; p<0.05); Wirbelbrüche geringer (124 vs. 84 events per 100 patient years; p< 0.025); Rate der Wirbelverformungen geringer (252 vs. 168; p< 0.001); Rate der Skeletmorbidität geringer (305 to 219 per patient years; p< 0.001); Überlebenszeit gleich

Kristensen et al (2)

Clodronate 1600 mg oral Placebo Zeit bis zum ersten Skelet-Ereignis höher (p<0.015); Zahl der Frakturen geringer (5 vs. 14; p< 0.023);Skelet - Ereignisse effects are not durable

Tubiana-Hulin et al (3)

Clodronate 1600 mg oral Placebo Zeit bis zum ersten Skelet-Ereignis höher (180 vs. 244 days; p = 0.05); Schmerzintensität geringer (p=0.01); Gebrauch von Analgetika geringer(67 vs. 84%; p=0.02)

Conte et al. (4)

Pamidronate (45 mg IV) Placebo Zeit bis zur Progression höher (249 vs. 168 days; p = 0.02; t by 48%); Schmerzverminderung höher (30 vs. 44% of patients; p = 0.025)

Hortobagyi et al. (5)

Pamidronate (90 mg IV) Placebo patients with Rate von Skeletereignissen geringer at 15,18, 21, and 24 months (p< 0.001); Zeit bis zum ersten Skelet-Ereignis geringer (7 vs. 13.9 months; p< 0.001); Überleben gleich

Theriault et al. (6)

Pamidronate (90 mg IV) Placebo Rate der Skeletmorbidität geringer at 12 months (3.6 vs. 2.4; p=0.028), 18 months (3.7 vs. 2.4; p= 0.023), and 24 months (3.8 vs. 2.4; p = 0.008);Skelet-Komplikationen geringer (56 vs. 67%; p = 0.049)

Body et al (7)

Ibandronate (6 mg IV) Placebo SMPR geringer( by 20%; 1.48 vs. 1.19 periods per patient year; p = 0.004); Zeit bis zum ersten Skelet-Ereignis geringer (50.6 vs. 33.1 weeks; p=0.018); risk of new bone events geringer(38%)

Body et al (8)

Ibandronate (50 mg/day oral) Placebo mean SMPR geringer (1.18 vs. 0.95; p=0.004); risk of Rate von Skeletereignissen geringer (HR = 0.62; 95% Cl, 0.48-0.79; p< 0.0001); No significant difference in % of patients with Rate von Skeletereignissen or time to Rate von Skeletereignissen

Kohno etal (9)

Zoledronic acid (4 mg IV) Placebo Rate von Skeletereignissen geringer (p = 0.027); in % of patients with > 1 Rate von Skeletereignissen geringer (49.6 vs. 29.8%; p = 0.003); Zeit bis zum ersten Skelet-Ereignis geringer (364 days vs. median not reached; p= 0.007); risk of Rate von Skeletereignissen geringer(by 41% geringer ; RR = 0.59; 95% Cl, 0.38-0.91; p= 0.019); bone pain geringer (32 vs. 45% of patients)

Rosen et al (10)

Zoledronic acid (4 mg IV) Pamidronate (90 mg IV) Similar rate of Rate von Skeletereignissen and Zeit bis zum ersten Skelet-Ereignis, risk of skeletal events geringer ( by 20% geringer; HR = 0.80; p = 0.04); risk of skeletal events geringer in patients with osteolytic lesions (30%) and Zeit bis zum ersten Skelet-Ereignis (174 vs. 310 days; p = 0.013)

Body et al (11)

Denosumab (0.1, 0.3,1.0, or 3.0 mg/kg SC) Pamidronate (90 mg IV) Sustained geringer in urinary and serum NTX in denosumab-treated patients

Stopeck et al (12)

Denosumab (120 mg SC) Zoledronic acid (4 mg IV) time to first on-study Rate von Skeletereignissen geringer (HR = 0.82; 95% Cl, 0.71-0.95; p< 0.0001 noninferiority; p = 0.01 superiority); time to first and subsequent on-study Rate von Skeletereignissen geringer (rate ratio 0.77; 95% Cl, 0.66-0.89; p=0.001); time to first radiation to bone geringer (HR = 0.74; 95% Cl, 0.59-0.94; p=0.01); time to first on-study Rate von Skeletereignissen geringer (HR = 0.82; 95% Cl, 0.70-0.95; p = 0.007); mean Rate der Skeletmorbidität geringer (0.45 vs. 0.58, respectively; p= 0.004); patients experiencing >1 on-study Rate von Skeletereignissen geringer (denosumab: 30.7%; zoledronic acid: 36.5%)

Diel et al (13)

Clodronate (1600 mg/day) Placebo Similar rates of bone metastasis (23.6 vs. 26.2%) (Median 103-month follow-up), deaths geringer (20.4 vs. 40.7%; p= 0.049)

Powles et al. (14)

Clodronate (1600 mg/day) Placebo risk of bone metastasis geringer (HR = 0.69; 95% Cl, 0.48-0.99; p=0.04) (5-year follow-up), risk of death geringer (HR = 0.77; p= 0.048)

Saarto et al (15)

Clodronate (1600 mg/day) nichts Similar rates of bone metastasis (42 vs. 32%) (10-year follow-up) treatment No difference in OS, DFS geringer (45 vs. 58%; p = 0.01)

ZO-FAST (16)

Upfront zoledronic acid (4 mg every 6 41 % nichts 41 % geringeres Risiko of DFS events (HR - 0.59; p = 0.031). 1035 Rezeptor-posizive Patientinnen Stadium I - IIIa. Adjuvant Letrezol und Zoladex. Gruppe A: upfront, gruppe B: Zoladex erst bei zu geringer Knochendichte oder Fraktur. Tumorereignisse: upfront: 42, delayed: 62.

ABCSG-12 (17)

Zoledronic acid nichts DFS höher (HR = 0.68; 95% Cl, 0.51-0.91; p = 0.008) Nonsignificant anstieg in OS (HR 0.61; 95% Cl, 0.41-1.09; p = 0.09)1803 Patientinnen, Rezeptor-positiv, Stadium I und II. Tumorereignisse: mit Zoladex 54/899, ohne Zoladex 82/904

AZURE (18)

Zoledronic acid nichts Größe des restlichen invasiven Tumors geringer (15.5 mm vs. 27.4 mm; p = 0.006)

NSABP-B34 (19)

Clodronat nichts  

OPTIMIZE-2

Efficacy and safety of continued zoledronic acid every 4 weeks versus every 12 weeks in women with bone metastases from breast cancer.

Quellen

1. Paterson AHG, Powles TJ, Kanis JA, et al.:
Double-blind controlled trial of oral clodronate in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer.
J Clin Oncol 1993;11:59-65

2. Kristensen B, Ejlertsen B, Groenvold M, et al.
Oral clodronate in breast cancer patients with bone metastases: a randomized study.
J Intern Med 1999; 246:67-74

3. Tubiana-Hulin M, Beuzeboc P, Mauriac L, et al.:
[Double-blinded controlled study comparing clodronate versus placebo in patients with breast cancer bone metastases].
Bull Cancer 2001;88:701-7

4. Conte PF, Latreille J, Mauriac L, et al.:
The Aredia Multinational Cooperative Group. Delay in progression of bone metastases in breast cancer patients treated with intravenous Pamidronate: results from a multinational random- ized controlled trial.
J Clin Oncol 1996;14:2552-9

5. Hortobagyi GN, Theriault RL, Lipton A, et al.:
Protocol 19 Aredia Breast Cancer Study Group. Long-term prevention of skeletal complications of metastatic breast cancer with Pamidronate.
J Clin Oncol 1998;16:2038-44

6. Theriault RL, Lipton A, Hortobagyi GN, et al.:
Protocol 18 Aredia Breast Cancer Study Group. Pamidronate reduces skeletal morbidity in women with advanced breast cancer and lytic bone lesions: a randomized, placebo- controlled trial.
J Clin Oncol 1999;17:846-54

7. Body JJ, Diel IJ, Lichinitser MR, et al.:
Intravenous ibandronate reduces the incidence of skeletal complications in patients with breast cancer and bone metastases.
Ann Oncol 2003;14:1399-405

8. Body JJ, Diel IJ, Lichinitzer M, et al.:
Oral ibandronate reduces the risk of skeletal complications in breast cancer patients with metastatic bone disease: results from two randomised, placebo-controlled phase III studies.
Br J Cancer 2004;90:1133-7

9. Kohno N, Aogi K, Minami H, et al.:
Zoledronic acid significantly reduces skel- etal complications compared with placebo in Japanese women with bone metastases from breast cancer: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
J Clin Oncol 2005;23:3314-21

10. Rosen LS, Gordon DH, Dugan Jr W, et al.:
Zoledronic acid is superior to Pamidronate for the treatment of bone metastases in breast Carcinoma patients with at least one osteolytic lesion.
Cancer 2004;100:36-43

11. Body JJ, Facon T, Coleman RE, et al.:
A study of the biological receptor activator of nuclear factor-Kß ligand inhibitor, denosumab, in patients with multiple myeloma or bone metastases from breast cancer.
Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:1221-8

12. Stopeck A, de Boer R, Fujiwara Y, et al.:
A comparison of denosumab ver- sus zoledronic acid for the prevention of skeletal-related events in breast cancer patients with bone metastases.
Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl): Abstract 22

13. Diel IJ, Solomayer EF, Costa SD, et al.:
Reduction in new metastases in breast cancer with adjuvant clodronate treatment.
N Engl J Med 1998;339: 357-63

13a. Diel IJ, Jaschke A, Solomayer EF, et al.:
Adjuvant oral clodronate improves the overall survival of primary breast cancer patients with micro- metastases to the bone marrow: a long-term follow-up.
Ann Oncol 2008;19:2007-11

14. Powles T, Paterson A, McCIoskey E, et al.:
Reduction in bone relapse and improved survival with oral clodronate for adjuvant treatment of operable breast cancer [ISRCTN83688026].
Breast Cancer Res 2006;8:R13

15. Saarto T, Vehmanen L, Virkkunen P, et al.:
Ten-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of adjuvant clodronate treatment in node-positive breast Cancer patients.
Acta Oncol 2004;43:650-6

16. Eidtmann H, de Boer R, Bundred N, et al.:
Efficacy of zoledronic acid in postmenopausal womenwith early breast cancerreceiving adjuvant letrezole: 36-momth results of the ZO-FAST Study.
Annal Oncol 2010 Epub aheasd of print

16a. Brufsky AM et al.::
Zoledronic acid effectively prevents aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer receiving adjuvant letresol: Z-FAST study 36-month follow-up results.
Clin Breast Cancer 9(2009):77-85

17. Gnant M, Mlineritsch B, Stoeger H, et al.:
Mature results from ABCSG-12: adjuvant ovarian suppression combined with tamoxifen or anastrozole, alone or in combination with zoledronic acid, in premenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer.
J Clin Oncol 2010;28: Abstract 533

18. Coleman RE, Winter MC, Cameron D, et al.:
The effects of adding zoledronic acid to neoadjuvant chemotherapy on tumour response: exploratory evi- dence for direct anti-tumour activity in breast Cancer.
Br J Cancer 2010; 102:1099-105

19.) Paterson AHG, et al.::
NSABP protocol B-34: a clinical trial comparing adjuvant clodronat vs. placebo in early stage breast cancer patients receiving systemic chemotherapy ang/or tamoxifen or no therapy - final analysis.
Cancer Res 71(2011):100s

Teil von

Mamma - Karzinom: Studien Mamma - Karzinom: StudienMamma - Karzinom Gynäkologische Onkologie
blauer Punkt

Impressum                         Zuletzt geändert am 02.10.2012 19:05