Mammakarzinom: Biphosphonat-Therapie | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
allgemeines |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EBCTCG - Metaanalyse(1) | Fragestellung: | Verbessern Biphosphonate das Ergebnis der adjuvanten Behandlung des Mammakarzinoms? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Antwort: | Biphosphonate vermindern bei postmenopausalen Frauen die Rate von Knochenmetastasen und die Brustkrebsmortalität bei der adjuvanten Behandlung des Mammakarzinoms! | Praemenopausale Frauen profitieren nicht von einer adjuvanten Biphosphonat - Therapie. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
adjuvante Studien |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quellen |
1.) Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG), Coleman R, et
al.: Adjuvant bisphosphonate treatment in early breast cancer: meta-analyses of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet 2015;386:1353-61. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60908-4. 2.) Gnant M, Mlineritsch B, Schippinger W et al.: Endocrine therapy plus zoledronic acid in premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2009; 360 (7): 679-691 3.) de Boer R, Bundred N, Eidtmann H et al.: Long-Term survival Outcomes among Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Letrozole and Zoledronic Acid: 5-Year Follow-Up of ZO-FAST. Cancer Res 2011; 71 4.) Coleman RE, Marshall H, Cameron D et al.: Breast-cancer adjuvant therapy with zoledronic acid. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 1396-1405 5.) Diel I, Jaschke A, Solomayer EF et al.: Adjuvant oral clodronate improves the overall survival of primary breast cancer patients with micrometastases to the hone marrow: a longterm follow-up. Ann Oncol 2008; 19: 2007-2011 6.) Powles T, Paterson S, Kanis JA et al.: Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of clodronate in patients with primary operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 3219-3224 7.) Paterson AHG, Anderson SJ, Lembersky BC et al.: NSABP Protocol B-34: A Clinical Trial Comparing Adjuvant clodronate vs. Placebo in Early Stage Breast Cancer patients Receiving Systemic Chemotherapy and / or Tamoxifen or No Therapy - Final Analysis. Cancer Res 2011; 71 8.) Paterson AHG, Anderson SJ, Lembersky BC et al.: Oral clodronate for adjuvant treatment of operable breast cancer (National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocol B-34): a multicentre, placebo-controlled, randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2012;13:734-42. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70226-7. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impressum Zuletzt geändert am 08.07.2024 11:56
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Dec 23;54:57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.10.011. [Epub ahead of print] Effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without zoledronic acid on pathological response: A meta-analysis of randomised trials. Kroep JR1, Charehbili A2, Coleman RE3, Aft RL4, Hasegawa Y5, Winter MC3, Weilbaecher K4, Akazawa K6, Hinsley S7, Putter H2, Liefers GJ2, Nortier JW2, Kohno N8. Author information Abstract PURPOSE: The addition of bisphosphonates to adjuvant therapy improves survival in postmenopausal breast cancer (BC) patients. We report a meta-analysis of four randomised trials of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) +/- zoledronic acid (ZA) in stage II/III BC to investigate the potential for enhancing the pathological response. METHODS: Individual patient data from four prospective randomised clinical trials reporting the effect of the addition of ZA on the pathological response after neoadjuvant CT were pooled. Primary outcomes were pathological complete response in the breast (pCRb) and in the breast and lymph nodes (pCR). Trial-level and individual patient data meta-analyses were done. Predefined subgroup-analyses were performed for postmenopausal women and patients with triple-negative BC. RESULTS: pCRb and pCR data were available in 735 and 552 patients respectively. In the total study population ZA addition to neoadjuvant CT did not increase pCRb or pCR rates. However, in postmenopausal patients, the addition of ZA resulted in a significant, near doubling of the pCRb rate (10.8% for CT only versus 17.7% with CT+ZA; odds ratio [OR] 2.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-4.55) and a non-significant benefit of the pCR rate (7.8% for CT only versus 14.6% with CT+ZA; OR 2.62, 95% CI 0.90-7.62). In patients with triple-negative BC a trend was observed favouring CT+ZA. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis shows no impact from the addition of ZA to neoadjuvant CT on pCR. However, as has been seen in the adjuvant setting, the addition of ZA to neoadjuvant CT may augment the effects of CT in postmenopausal patients with BC.